I know I'm not alone in questioning Apple's long held business practices. As such, I've chosen to stay away from its products, which is my option as a consumer. When it comes to these areas which I hold dear, Apple has never satisfied.
Make a move screen shot mac os software#
I'm a firm believer of keeping my dollar vote strictly aligned with companies that see eye to eye on things like consumer choice, software freedom, and price competition.
Make a move screen shot mac os free#
It has always adhered to a Henry Ford-esque mentality when it comes to choice, and it goes against my every grain of consumer free will in gravitating towards more options, not less.Īnd perhaps my biggest stoic objection to Apple has always been a philosophical one coming from my dislike of the crux of what supports the Apple OS X computer business: a reluctance to allow OS X onto anything other than Apple-branded hardware. Likewise, I've never been satisfied with the limited choice Apple affords buyers of its computers. I'm a tinkerer at heart, and can't stand the closed nature of the hardware around Apple's computers. Some would come to the conclusion that this makes me an Apple hater, but that's merely a convenient way for Apple loyalists to paint me as someone who doesn't have any merit to my opinion. So that I can get it out in the open, I'll fully admit my curiosity on this subject stems from my own personal objections for why I have never purchased an Apple computer. One that takes into account consumer choice, hardware innovation, technical feasibility, and other points of interest that may or may not have been tossed around.
And as such, it has constructed licensing legalese to help keep the kingdom of Apple computers strong.īut I wanted to step back and take a more holistic, almost philosophical approach to this debate.
It has a moral obligation to shareholders to maximize profits for the business. But that doesn't answer the why of what I'm digging at financial and legal restraints are merely artificial boundaries for something that is otherwise quite feasible, as I'll prove below.Īpple makes a lot of money on the hardware it sells with each OS X system, and it is a corporation, so 2+2 here makes sense.
And I also know that the company has legal restrictions in place to prevent it from happening as well. I know very well there are business reasons it doesn't allow it.